Saturday, May 5, 2012

Agriculture cooperatives could end hunger while boosting socio-economic development in impoverished regions

Monsanto and Cargill keep rolling on, leading a handful of other mega-corporations toward planetary food and farming control that ensures our demise. Meanwhile, important studies are ignored by our corrupt governments who are heavily influenced and infiltrated by those very same companies.

A world-wide study was initiated by the United Nations (UN) a few years ago to investigate solutions for world hunger as our population increases. This contradicts the efforts of certain elites who create humanitarian covers for their agenda of radically decreasing the population with unworkable and toxic large-scale agricultural programs.

The UN study's conclusion contradicts their plans completely.

The UN report involved many experts and took a few years to complete. The report's coordinator, Olivier De Schutter, presented this press release that received scant attention: "We won't solve hunger and stop climate change with industrial farming on large plantations. The solution lies in supporting small-scale farmers [and to] contribute to rural development. Each region must be able to feed itself."



Other reports ignored and marginalized

The UN report was not the only study conducted recently favoring small-scale organic farming. Feeding the Future, a report released by the UK's Soil Association, confirmed the UN study with the added focus of organic farming for soil preservation.

The Rodale Institute released their long study with the conclusion that locking farmers into GMO seed contracts was certain to destroy most farmers. Additionally, crop yields are less with GM farming than both conventional and organic farming (http://www.naturalnews.com).

Nevertheless, Monsanto and others get their "feeding the world" press releases out to the "lamestream" media to convince a majority of the public that GMOs and Big-Ag are the solutions for feeding the world. Their disinformation obscures the issues of less nutrition and more toxins going into our food.

This extremely tilted playing field for determining our food supply can be disheartening for participants of the "good fight". But resist we must for us and our progeny (http://www.naturalnews.com/033772_Monsanto_Roundup.html).

As farming activist Dr. Vandana Shiva of India points out: "Seeds controlled by Monsanto, agribusiness trade controlled by Cargill, processing controlled by Pepsi and Phillip Morris, retail controlled by Walmart - is a recipe for food dictatorship. We must occupy the food system to create food democracy."



The effort to create regional agricultural cooperatives world-wide

The rising price of food could be restrained by keeping Wall Street out of the mix. Greedy investors speculate with food commodities, driving prices up more than even supply shortages affect prices.

Large commercial farms create the need for large food broker/distributors such as Cargill who wield too much influence on pricing, distribution, and how agriculture should be managed.

Regional food distribution is a solution for creating support for local organic farming and decentralizing food distribution while restricting commodities market's latest game of derivatives trading that destabilizes prices.

The UN has declared 2012 as the "International Year of Cooperatives."

Agricultural cooperatives do exist currently. Now the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) is pooling more resources to make the UN declaration for 2012 an eventual reality.

IFAD has created training programs for small rural farmers to understand better basic natural farming techniques with no GMOs or excessive chemical use. This ensures fresher, healthier food for consumers while enabling farmers to enjoy higher profits within regional direct marketing networks.

IFAD President Kanayo Nwanze asserts that farmers should be recognized as important small entrepreneurs for the future of our food. Having each region responsible for feeding itself is a viable solution for farmers and consumers.

Buying locally now as often as possible helps this cause if you can't get directly involved with the IFAD effort.

Sources for this article include:

PDF of UN agriculture report submitted December 2010: http://www.srfood.org

IFAD: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/10470

http://www.change.org

http://www.slashfood.com

http://www.worldwatch.org/node/4060

http://www.soilassociation.org

Friday, May 4, 2012

Learn about the amazing health benefits of juicing raw cannabis (marijuana) leaves

Contrary to popular belief, the marijuana plant is a whole lot more than just a psychoactive drug that "stoners" use to get high. In raw form, marijuana leaves and buds are actually loaded with a non-psychoactive, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer nutrient compound known as cannabidiol (CBD) that is proving to be a miracle "superfood" capable of preventing and reversing a host of chronic illnesses.

Though you may not have heard much about it, the CBD found in the marijuana plant -- marijuana is technically just a vegetable, by the way -- is a highly medicinal substance with unique immune-regulating capabilities. Since the human body already contains a built-in endogenous cannabinoid system, complete with cannabinoid receptors, inputting CBD from marijuana can help normalize the body's functional systems, including cell communication and proper immune function.

The way CBDs work is that they bridge the gap of neurotransmission in the central nervous system, including in the brain, by providing a two-way system of communication that completes a positive "feedback loop," according to Dr. William Courtney, a medical marijuana expert and founder of Cannabis International. As opposed to a one-way transmission, which can promote chronic inflammation of healthy tissue, the unique two-way transmission system engaged by marijuana CBDs mimics the body's own natural two-way communications system.

So individuals whose systems are compromised by autoimmune disorders, cellular dysfunction, chronic inflammation, cancer cells, and various other illnesses can derive a wide range of health-promoting benefits simply by consuming CBDs. And one of the best ways to obtain CBDs is to juice raw marijuana leaves and buds, according to Dr. Courtney, who currently runs a clinic in Luxembourg that provides raw cannabis medicinal services to patients in need.

"CBD works on receptors, and as it turns out, we have cannabinoids in our bodies, endogenous cannabinoids, that turn out to be very effective at regulating immune functions, nerve functions, bone functions," says Dr. Ethan Russo, a Seattle, Wash.-area physician who is also a senior advisor to GW Pharmaceuticals, a British drug company that is utilizing CBDs in a new marijuana mouth spray known as Sativex.

"There's a tendency to discount claims when something appears to be good for everything, but there's a reason this is the case. The endogenous cannabinoid system acts as a modulator in fine-tuning a lot of these systems, and if something is deranged biochemically in a person's body, it may well be that a cannabinoid system can bring things back into balance."

Be sure to check out these amazing videos from Cannabis International that explain more about how raw cannabis, and specifically the CBDs found inside the plant, work to promote health and reverse disease:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa0nLdVJiIg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJ4QR2NqgWU



As long as marijuana remains a Schedule 1 drug with 'no currently accepted medical use,' most Americans will never realize its benefits

While some U.S. states like California and Colorado are beginning to recognize and accept that marijuana has legitimate therapeutic value, the federal government continues to classify marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug with "no currently accepted medical use." And as long as it remains classified in this way, most Americans will never have the opportunity to experience the healing potential of this vital superfood.

But Cannabis International and other groups are continuing to educate the public about why marijuana is a food essential, and how legalizing it could change the world. To learn more, be sure to visit:
http://www.cannabisinternational.org/

Sources for this article include:

http://www.washingtonpost.com

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Use vinegar to kill weeds naturally and give Monsanto's Roundup the boot

There's been lots written recently about the toxicity of Monsanto's poster child product Roundup, exposing how harmful it is for the earth and how poisonous it is on exposure for both animals and humans. However, what is not common knowledge to most organic gardeners and back yard enthusiasts is how they can manage weed control safely without the need for dangerous pesticides. Use vinegar to kill weeds naturally and safely, with no side effects to you, your pets, wildlife and mother earth. Killing weeds naturally with vinegar allows you to target exactly what weeds to eradicate, and it's cheap and easy to use.

Vinegar is not choosy and cannot differentiate between broad-leaf weeds, narrow-leaf weeds, grass, flowers or vegetables. If you're not careful when applying vinegar for weed control, it will kill whatever it touches. So although it's eco-friendly and biodegradable, it takes a little forethought to manage an effective application.



How to apply vinegar for natural weed control

The best way to apply vinegar for weed control is with a spray bottle or pump sprayer. These tools are most effective if you're wanting to eliminate large swatches of weeds on walkways, driveways or other areas where there are no other plants immediately at risk. Because vinegar is not selective, using it for killing weeds naturally should be done on a sunny day when there is no wind to prevent it from blowing onto other plants. Part of the killing process uses the sunlight to activate the vinegar; so check the weather beforehand to be sure it's not about to rain right after you spray. If you're trying to be very selective and kill small batches of weeds in among other plants and flowers, apply vinegar with an old brush only to the weeds being targeted.

Spray or paint the vinegar on liberally to kill weeds naturally. Leaves and stems should be soaked. Allow it to dry and wait for a day or two to see full results. You may have to reapply more vinegar periodically. Any type of vinegar will work to kill weeds and white vinegar is the least expensive. Keep several gallons in your shed so it's on hand when needed.

When to apply natural herbicides

Use vinegar to kill weeds before the weeds go to seed to prevent new weeds from growing. Catch them when they're small in the early spring. Alternatively, it's best to treat perennial weeds like dandelions in the early fall. Remove the seed heads throughout the summer when you see them. Spraying in the autumn uses the plant's natural cycle to absorb nutrients through the leave to the roots and allows the vinegar natural weed control to penetrate to the core of the plant killing it at the root.

Sources for this article include:

A Garden for the House: Got Weeds? Use Vinegar, Not Roundup
http://www.agardenforthehouse.com

About.com: Landscaping: Vinegar as a Natural Weed Killer
http://landscaping.about.com/od/weedsdiseases/qt/vinegar_weeds.htm

The Garden Counselor: Lawn Care -- Vinegar Weed Killer
http://www.garden-counselor-lawn-care.com/vinegar-weed-killer.html

About the author:
JB Bardot is trained in herbal medicine and homeopathy, and has a post graduate degree in holistic nutrition. Bardot cares for both people and animals, using alternative approaches to health care and lifestyle. You can find her on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001364941208&ref=tn_tnmn or on Twitter at jbbardot23

Artificial sweeteners and flavor enhancers are dangerous

Due to our society's love of sugar, scientists have been able to synthetically produce artificial sweeteners and flavor enhancers. These artificial sweeteners give us the same pleasure as sugar without the calories and dangerous effects on insulin signaling and triglyceride formation. This includes aspartame, acefultame potassium, monosodium glutamate, sucralose and many others. Unfortunately, these artificial sweeteners and flavor enhancers break down into highly toxic chemical agents that damage important regions of the body.

Ideal sweeteners are formed in nature and are minimally processed. These would include organic sugar, stevia, raw honey, maple syrup, etc. The greater the processing the more dangerous the sweetener can potentially be. Artificial sweeteners are often devised completely in a laboratory or they begin as sugar and undergo massive processing. Some of the most dangerous artificial sweeteners & flavor enhancers include the following:

Aspartame: Originally approved in 1981 for use in food is 200 times sweeter than sugar. It is composed of 50 percent phenylalanine, 40 percent aspartic acid and 10 percent methanol. Excess phenylalanine has been shown to disrupt normal serotonin levels in the nervous system which can lead to depressive, emotional & psychotic disorders. Individuals who continually consume aspartame will have elevated phenylalanine.

Aspartic acid: an excitotoxin that literally over excites neurons and destroys cells. Methanol is also a neurotoxin and its absorption is also increased when aspartame is heated above 86 degrees Fahrenheit. This heating breaks methanol into formaldehyde which damages the nervous system and is highly carcinogenic.

Acefultame Potassium: This artificial sweetener is often times used in combination with other artificial sweeteners such as sucralose and/or aspartame to mask any form of after taste. This sweetener has been shown to stimulate insulin secretions even though it does not increase blood sugar. Elevated insulin increases inflammation and hampers immunity. Since Acefultame does not increase blood sugar this insulin response can stimulate reactive hypoglycemia. It has been linked to leukemia, breast cancer, thymus cancer and chronic respiratory diseases.

Sucralose: This artificial sweetener is marketed as if it came
from natural sugar. However, it is highly processed with three chlorine
atoms that damage the microflora within the human gut. The biochemist
Dr. James Bown says "sucralose is simply chlorinated sugar." Sucralose
has been shown to damage the thymus gland and inflame the liver and
kidneys. Chlorine is a natural anti-septic that harms the human gut and
destroys microflora leading to candida formation, irritable bowel
syndrome, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, obesity and cachexia.

Sodium Benzoate: This is a type of water soluble preservative salt that
is created by adding sodium hydroxide and benzoic acid. It is found in
many soft drinks, energy drinks and other processed foods and drinks.
Sodium Benzoate consumption has been strongly linked with
neurodevelopmental disorders such as ADHD and inflammatory disorders
such as asthma. The combination of sodium benzoate and ascorbic acid
(vitamin C) which is quite common in soft drinks and popular energy
drinks creates the highly carcinogenic substance benzene. Benzene is
linked with many serious cancers such as leukemia and lymphoma.

Monosodium glutamate: This extremely dangerous flavor enhancer and preservative is used in many canned and packaged foods. The Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine has stated that it promotes the growth of cancer cells and is highly neurotoxic in the body. Other studies have linked it to liver damage, chronic inflammation, chronic pain and weight loss resistance. It is often included under deceptive names such as autolyzed yeast extract, natural flavorings, soy protein, whey protein isolate, etc.


Sources For This Article Include
http://www.naturalnews.com
http://www.livestrong.com/article/22015-dangerous-additives/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acesulfame_potassium
http://www.naturalnews.com/033914_Splenda_Essentials_sweetener.html

About the author:
Dr. David Jockers owns and operates Exodus Health Center in Kennesaw, Ga. He is a Maximized Living doctor. His expertise is in weight loss, customized nutrition & exercise, & structural corrective chiropractic care. For more information go to www.exodushc.com To find a Maximized Living doctor near you go to www.maximizedliving.com Dr. Jockers is also available for long distance phone consultations to help you beat disease and reach your health goals

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Chemist declares fluoride to be 'one of the greatest public health threats of modern times'

Ingesting artificial fluoride chemicals does not prevent tooth decay, but rather destroys your insides and leads to the development of cancer and other illnesses. These are the disturbing findings of an assessment recently compiled by award-winning chemist, author, and founder of ThePeoplesChemist.com, Shane Ellison.

Frustrating more than 50 years of bad science that has claimed the exact opposite, Ellison's appraisal of fluoride's negative effects on the body shows once again why removing fluoride from public water supplies is crucial to public health. And health freedom advocates must step up to be the educational catalyst for bringing about this change nationwide.

"Once ingested, fluoride compounds attack the structural integrity of our insides," says Ellison. "Collagen, a web-like network connecting our skeletal system to muscles, is torn apart by fluoride. We feel it as joint stiffness, ligament damage, and aching bones. This same mechanism leads to browning of teeth, an outcome known as fluorosis."

Ellison adds that laboratory studies dating back decades have shown that fluoride spurs the mutation of mammalian DNA cells, which can promote the growth of cancer cells. Various population studies, he says, have shown that fluoride ingestion can increase a person's risk of developing bone cancer by as much as 700 percent.

And finally, fluoride has never been shown to actually prevent cavities, which is the excuse most often used to continue lacing public water supplies with this toxic poison. On the contrary, fluoride ingestion actually promotes tooth decay, and even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admits that there is no verifiable, scientific proof that fluoride in any way prevents cavities.

So why does artificial water fluoridation continue to persist in many towns and cities across America today? A combination of ignorance and pride both appear to be factors, as the medical establishment largely refuses to accept modern science showing that fluoride is unsafe because it has been claiming for many decades that fluoride is safe.

John Garfield from The University Daily Kansan recently wrote his own assessment of the dangers of fluoride, noting that the best available science links fluoride consumption to thyroid disorders, endocrine disruption, reproductive damage, skin problems, brittle bones, immunodeficiency, premature puberty, and lowered IQ (http://www.kansan.com/news/2012/apr/26/water-fluoridation/).

The evidence is so strong against fluoride these days that nearly 40 U.S. communities stopped fluoridating their water in 2011 (http://www.naturalnews.com), and many more, including Albuquerque, N.M., Bolivar, Mo., and Myerstown, Penn., have ended water fluoridation in 2012.

To learn more about Shane Ellison's work, visit:
http://thepeopleschemist.com/

To learn more about the dangers of fluoride, visit:
http://www.fluoridealert.org/

Sources for this article include:

http://thepeopleschemist.com

http://www.newswithviews.com/Ellison/shane167.htm

http://www.ewg.org/fluoride

Monday, April 30, 2012

Sodium Is Good For You, Table Salt Is Not

So, sodium is good for you! What does your brain do with that? Most people experience a knee-jerk reaction and think "That can't possibly be true!" We've been so led to believe that sodium is bad for you. How can it possibly be good for you?

There is so much confusion, disinformation, and misinformation about sodium and salt that covers the spectrum of credible sources, from medical doctors to Joe Six-Pack. And it's really simple to untangle the gnarlyness when we realize that this confusion has to do with simple definitions gone awry. Once we have a more accurate terminology in place, we can begin to address the serious health issues caused by sodium DEFICIENCY. Unless we do this, sodium deficiency will continue to be ignored as a contributing cause to most health issues. So here we go:

There are three terms that we need to define more accurately and these definitions must have very clear distinctions from each other. These terms are: Sodium, Sodium Chloride and Salt. These are three completely different substances. Let's look at them individually. Then we'll see how the confusion ensues, what we can do to rectify it and why we would want to.

SODIUM
First let's look at sodium. Sodium in the body is different than sodium out of the body. So even with sodium, we can probably benefit by making this distiction. Let's call sodium outside of the body, inorganic sodium. This is a very unstable metal which becomes stabilized by combining it with other substances. When sodium in the soil is uptaken into the root system of a plant, it becomes stabilized by the process of photosynthesis, combining the elements of air, light and water to create what we can call organic sodium. For the purpose of this article "sodium" refers to this organic sodium.

Briefly, sodium is an electrolytic mineral. Some other electrolytes are potassium, magnesium, calcium, lithium and phosphorous. Sodium is found throughout the human body from birth. Our dependency on sodium to regulate various organs and metabolic functions is mind-boggling. It is found in every cell of our body. Having a symbiotic relation to potassium, the two create an electric charge that contributes toward cell life and energy. There is actually a pump-like action on every cell that pumps potassium in and sodium out. (Although one source claims the sodium goes in and the potassium out.) Sodium is found at work in the stomach, the gallbladder, the joints, and all of our cells. Even our very own DNA is mostly sodium!

SALT
Ancient sea beds that have dried up leave behind the mineral content of the sea (minus the water). The mineral content of a piece of rock salt will vary from location to location. But in general, there are usually over 80 different trace minerals, including sodium.

SODIUM CHLORIDE
Sodium chloride is the chemical compound more commonly known as table salt. It is sodium from rock salt that has been stripped from all the other healthful minerals and stabilized by the gas chlorine. A natural form of sodium chloride occurs in our oceans but this isn't the same thing as table salt which is processed in a factory. In the processing of table salt, the sodium is ionically bound to the chlorine, creating a substance that is neither sodium, salt or chlorine. The ionic bond is unbreakable in the process of digestion. We cannot possibly extract the sodium from table salt and put it to use in our body. In fact, the process of digesting sodium chloride requires us to extract sodium from our body in order to detoxify it and get it out or our system. The body treats sodium chloride like a toxin!

In the media and in the minds of health care professionals, not to mention the public, these terms are all interchangeable. When I hear that some doctor told his patient not to eat celery because it has sodium in it and will contribute to her hypertension, we are witnessing a serious problem of ignorance leading the ignorant. Packaged foods tout that their product is "sodium free", which is probably true, but not beneficial. A more helpful claim would be "sodium chloride free". Nutritional labels add to the confusion by listing the percentage of sodium in their product. Are they listing the amount of sodium chloride or sodium and do they even know how to make the distinction?

Why does this matter and why should anyone care? Is this a deliberate attempt to dupe the public into making poor dietary choices, leading to compromised health, leading to profits to drug companies and doctors? It sure seems that way. If you want to know why this matters, please continue reading.

Sodium has many functions and it is important to look into some of these. Before doing so, a quick summary of pH is required. pH stands for potential hydrogen. It is a way of determining the alkalinity or acidity of a substance, or the effect of a substance in a localized area in our body. The pH can be measured on a scale of 0-14. 7 is neutral, where anything below is acid, anything above is alkaline. The lower the number, the more acidic. The higher the number, the more alkaline. Also, a food such as a lemon, may be acid before we eat it, but it is an alkaline-forming substance once eaten, that is, it contributes towards an alkaline state in the body.

One thing to keep in mind about pH, is that there are different ideal pH levels throughout the body. It is common to hear people talk about having an alkaline diet, or being alkaline inside. But it is also inaccurate and an oversimplification to think of our body that way. Different body functions and organs have different optimal pH levels.

For example, the stomach creates hydrochloric acid to help digest and break down proteins and fats in the food we eat. The optimal pH level of hydrochloric acid is .4 which is very acidic. This level of acidity can also destroy unwanted pathogens and microorganisms such as e.coli. What mineral do you think is important in regulating hydrochloric acid levels? SODIUM! In a healthy person, sodium is found in abundance in the mucosa lining of the stomach.

After the food is saturated with hydrochloric acid, the resulting chyme (pronounced kime) moves into the small intestine where the broken-down nutrients attempt to be uptaken into the blood and liver. But the chyme is still highly acidic and would burn the intestine. Fortunately, when it enters the small intestine it is saturated by a bile that is highly alkaline. This bile is created in the gallbladder and an optimal level in a healthy person is close to 14 (highly alkaline). What mineral regulates the alkaline level of this bile? SODIUM!!! In a healthy person, sodium is found in abundance in the gallbladder.

Now what happens in the stomach, when the sodium is removed and it can't help regulate the acidity of hydrochloric acid? The hydrochloric acid becomes weaker, meaning it has a higher pH level. Proteins and fats aren't broken down as much so the body can't absorb them in the small intestine. AND microorganisms have a free pass into the body. You can eat all the meat in the world and not be able to absorb and use ANY of the protein because it's not being broken down to the amino acids, which the body uses to rebuild protein in the liver. When sodium is removed from the gallbladder what happens? The bile doesn't alkalize the acidic chyme and you can experience unpleasant burning sensations after eating. Also, sodium keeps calcium moist in the gallbladder, and when it is removed the calcium hardens resulting in gallstones.

So here we have clear examples of how to determine a sodium deficiency: gallstones and poor hydrochloric acid levels. But what causes the sodium to leave the stomach and gallbladder in the first place? Let's look at the blood. Blood has to stay within the small pH range of 6.8 - 7.2. If it goes above or below that range, we die. What mineral helps to regulate the pH level of our blood? SODIUM!!! If we are not bringing sodium into our body to regulate the pH level of the blood, then the body, in order to survive, has to pull the sodium from other areas in the body. It probably starts with the stomach and gallbladder. Then after those sodium reserves have been depleted, it starts to take it from our bones and joints. If sodium keeps calcium moist, having sodium extracted from the joints may be a contributing factor to arthritis. Finally, as a last resort, the body starts extracting sodium from our cells, causing our cell energy to slow down. And then if it needs more, it can always get it from our DNA.

Hopefully now you can see the implications of not having enough sodium in the diet. The issue of sodium deficiency can lead to all sorts of problems. So how do we prevent sodium deficiency? Not only is sodium destroyed in the process of cooking foods, one of its important functions is to buffer and neutralize acids. So ANY acid-forming substance (meat, dairy, cooked foods, alcohol, coffee, grains, bread, unfermented soy products, pharmaceutical drugs, sodium chloride aka table salt, and STRESS) extracts sodium from our reserves. If we are not replenishing with sodium in the diet, and minimizing our intake of acid-forming foods, then we begin a chain reaction of unbuffered acids entering our digestive system unable to be broken down into absorbable nutrients and clogging up the passages of our intestines. This would be like putting sludge in the gas tank of your car.

Sodium deficiency can only be addressed by eliminating the acid-forming foods from our diet. It is not just a matter of eating more sodium rich foods in their raw state!

OK, I know eliminating all those acid-forming foods right away is challenging for most people and the idea can be overwhelming. For those with immediate health concerns, you probably don't have much choice but to eliminate as many as possible and replenish with plenty of sodium-rich vegetable juices. Your other choice is to trust the medical establishment. (If you are reading this, you have probably moved away from trusting in that option.) But for those of us who are not currently with observable discomforts, if you don't want to experience physical problems in the future, you would be best served by eliminating as many of the acid-forming substances that you can and phasing out the others at your own pace, while adding more sodium to the diet. The most important first step would be to stop ingesting sodium chloride, and use instead, high quality salt in your own food preparations. If you eat out, it is harder to avoid sodium chloride. Well, probably impossible unless you eat at a raw foods restaurant.

So the sodium rich foods would be (all organically grown and raw): celery, sea veggies like dulse, kelp, nori, aloe, vegetable juices. Unprocessed rock salt is also a great source of sodium and contains all sorts of micro-nutrients.

Sea Salt vs. Himalayan Rock Salt
Both of these products have become popular choices among health-conscious consumers. According to David Favor, the problem with sea salt, which is usually harvested off the coast of France, is that it contains petroleum by-products from the pollution in the ocean. Apparently the French government realizes this and prohibits the sale of sea salt to its citizens, recognizing the potential health concern. Himalayan rock salt, again according to David Favor, is always ground with cheap quality nickel-plated grinders. Nickel dust ends up in the finished product. Nickel is a highly toxic heavy metal. David Favor sells a product called Sunfire Salt which is a blend of 4 different salts from different regions: Himalayan pink salt, Bolivia, Hawaii, and China. He had to arrange for higher grade grinders to be used that are harder than the rock salt, to prevent contamination in the product.

Another interesting source of sodium is called SOLE. This is prepared by taking 1 or 2 chunks of Himalayan rock salt and adding water in a jar. After a couple of days, the rocks actually melt, or rather, the water becomes saturated with the mineral contents of the rocks. The resulting liquid is SOLE. This can be added to water to re-mineralize it, or to add a salty taste to any recipe where salt is required. It's concentrated salt liquid and the minerals are easily absorbed by the body. To learn more about sole, go to www.americanbluegreen.com

Sodium deficiency is a serious health concern that affects problably more than 90% of the Western diet-eating population. There are stages of symptoms. Unfortunatley, sodium deficiency is not only never addressed, it is considered an oxymoron because of the confusion in terminology! When you get a blood test, and it shows plenty of sodium, a doctor isn't going to think, "Aha! Sodium deficiency!" The sodium is in the blood because it has been extracted from other parts of the body to regulate the pH of the blood. It's not in the blood because one is eating too many potato chips! Sodium chloride doesn't even make it into the bloodstream. As mentioned earlier, the human body can't even extract the sodium from the sodium chloride. It goes straight through the digestive tract. Don't believe me? Why wouldn't you believe me? Why would I lie to you? Well, try an experiment. Put 2 Tablespoons of sodium chloride (table salt) in 1/2 a gallon of water and drink it down. It tastes horrible. Within an hour, it will come out as liquid from your butt. This is known as a salt water flush. The next day do the same thing but use real salt. Your body absorbs that salt in digestion so it doesn't come out where fecal matter should.

Hopefully this article will help to start to clear up the confusion regarding sodium. Please forward this information far and wide. And maybe in our life time we will see a reverse of the thorough brainwash job that the most important mineral to the function of the human body is BAD for us.

Monday, April 23, 2012

Over 60 Billion Doses a Year and Not ONE Death, But Still Not Safe?

By Dr. Mercola
Vitamins, minerals and herbal supplements have a tremendously safe track record, yet they are often singled out as being potentially dangerous by government agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
This – the notion that dietary supplements are unsafe -- is the premise behind the FDA's Draft Guidance on New Dietary Ingredients, which would require the supplement industry to prove the safety of natural ingredients that, in many cases, have been on the market and used safely for decades.
As new research from the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System reveals, there were zero deaths linked to nutritional supplements in 2010, the most current data available.

Zero Deaths Linked to Vitamin Supplements

However, in the FDA's new Draft Guidance, the FDA is essentially claiming that dietary supplements are unsafe, and implying that in order to "protect consumers" the agency must place a stranglehold on the dietary supplement industry by requesting exorbitant safety testing.
These ludicrous safety thresholds are in excess of those required by pharmaceutical drugs -- despite extensive toxicological data showing supplements are far safer than drugs.
The most recent data comes from the U.S. National Poison Data System's annual report, which tracked data from 57 U.S. poison centers and showed vitamin and mineral supplements caused zero deaths in 2010.i
As noted by Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, Americans easily take more than 60 billion doses of nutritional supplements every year, and with zero related deaths this is an outstanding safety record:
"Well over half of the U.S. population takes daily nutritional supplements. Even if each of those people took only one single tablet daily, that makes 165,000,000 individual doses per day, for a total of over 60 billion doses annually. Since many persons take far more than just one single vitamin or mineral tablet, actual consumption is considerably higher, and the safety of nutritional supplements is all the more remarkable.
Over 60 billion doses of vitamin and mineral supplements per year in the USA, and not a single fatality. Not one. If vitamin and mineral supplements are allegedly so "dangerous," as the FDA and news media so often claim, then where are the bodies?"
In striking contrast, drugs are known to cause well over 125,000 deaths per year when taken correctly as prescribed – yet the FDA allows "fast-track" approvals and countless new additions to the marketplace. So why are dietary supplements on the chopping block?

Why is the FDA Attacking Dietary Supplements That Have Been Used Safely for Decades?

Back in the early 1990s, the FDA threatened the availability of dietary supplements to the point that consumers staged a massive revolt, which resulted in the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA). The law specifically protects your access to dietary supplements by classifying them as foods, not food additives or drugs, and it grand-fathered in dietary supplements that were already in use as of 1994. Only novel ingredients introduced after October 15, 1994 are required to seek FDA approval.
The FDA's new proposed mandates directly contradict what DSHEA sought to prevent, and the FDA is using its authority in direct violation of Congressional intent. As explained in an article by Alliance for Natural Health, the proposed regulations turn what was clearly supposed to be a pre-market notification system into a pre-approval system, just like that of drugs.ii
As a result, dietary supplements that have been freely available for nearly two decades can now be forced off the market until they receive New Dietary Ingredient (NDI) approval. And the NDI approval process is a lengthy affair that may take months or years to complete, and cost a small fortune. Bringing a drug from the pre-clinical (or discovery phase) all the way to market can easily take more than a decade and cost significantly more than $1 billion! This despite the fact that contrary to drugs, fatalities from vitamins and other supplements are minuscule.

According to the 2001 report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC), of the substances implicated in fatal poisonings in 2001, 84.6 percent were pharmaceutical drugs, with analgesics being implicated as the primary cause of death in 32 percent of fatalities or 341 deaths. This compares with 0.8 percent for all dietary supplements combined, even including substances such as dinitrophenol, a dangerous (and illegal) substance banned in 1938, as well as the central nervous system stimulant Ma Huang (Ephedra). Interestingly, the anti-asthma drug theophylline alone was responsible for 15 deaths, 66 percent more than all the available dietary supplements combined.
What might make an "old" ingredient "new," under the new regulation?
The methods of production and extraction, for example … As bizarre as that sounds, the mere fact that a product is being extracted or produced by improved means compared to methods used in the past, could reclassify any grandfathered nutrient as an NDI that would now have to undergo the same type of safety testing and approval process as a drug.

FDA Seeking Outrageous Safety Studies from Tried and True Supplements

In some cases, the FDA will require manufacturers to conduct outrageously expensive studies using absurdly high doses, in some situations multiplied by a "safety factor" up to 2,000-times the recommended dosage on a per product basis. Further, the FDA proposes that new dietary supplement ingredients should adhere to aggressive safety margins, which are typically reserved for chemical compounds known to be dangerous in all but the most miniscule concentrations.
Since food additives or preservatives such as aspartame, monosodium glutamate, and sodium nitrate are known to cause cancer or other severe health problems, the FDA has implemented safety guidelines that limit allowable concentrations of these food additives to levels that are supposed to be physiologically inert.
The fact that the FDA is trying to impose the same limits upon dietary supplements seems to be arbitrary and completely unfounded. In fact, when someone takes a dietary supplement, their intent is to positively affect the structure or function of their bodies in some way -- limiting dosages of dietary supplements to physiologically inert levels defeats the entire purpose of supplementation with health-sustaining nutrients.
And, since supplements are not patented drugs, virtually no supplement manufacturers will be able to afford these "safety" studies, which means that many of the nutrients you now purchase at low prices will convert into high-priced drugs, or simply disappear from the market entirely.

The Drug Industry is the Real Safety Threat

While the U.S. National Poison Data System's annual report showed zero deaths from nutritional supplements, this was not the case for prescription and over-the-counter drugs. The top categories associated with the largest number of fatalities were ALL medications, including
  1. Analgesics, sedatives, hypnotics, and antipsychotics
  2. Cardiovascular drugs
  3. Opioids
  4. Acetaminophen combinations
  5. Antidepressants
Slightly lower down on the list were more drugs, including muscle relaxants, anti-inflammatory drugs, hormones, antacids, anticoagulants, antihistamines and more. Out of a total 1,366 reported fatalities, pharmaceuticals were involved in over 1,100 of these deaths (again, compared to zero for supplements). Keep in mind that this is not an estimate of all the deaths attributed to pharmaceuticals in the U.S., only those reported to 57 poison control centers. The total figure is closer to 125,000 deaths from pharmaceuticals per year. iii
If you extrapolate this number out over 30 years this is well in excess of 3 million people who died from taking appropriately prescribed legal drugs. It is simply incomprehensible that any rational approach would seek to vilify supplements over drugs when the data in no way, shape or form supports it. The most likely motive for this position is financial greed that can put your life in jeopardy.

Defend Your Right to Continue Taking Safe Supplements

No one can sit on the sidelines with an emergency of this magnitude about to befall everyone who depends on dietary supplements. As citizens, we have the constitutional right to petition the government to redress our grievances. In this case, the FDA NDI proposals pose a direct threat to our health and longevity by threatening free access to dietary supplements with exemplary safety records.
We therefore have to take extraordinary measures to defend our right to continue using supplements that our very lives depend on, and to gain access to new natural ingredients that demonstrate efficacy in scientific studies. I ask each one of you to contact your representatives by following this link:
Recall how consumers revolted back in 1994 and the result was a glorious victory over FDA tyranny! Let your voice be heard by exercising your right to petition the government against these serious violations of the law and scientific principle. Please be sure to call, fax, or send a certified letter to your representative -- emails can be easily dismissed. Here is a set of talking points for your consideration:
  • My name is [Name] and I am a constituent of [Congress Member's name].
  • I am very concerned about the new FDA draft guidance on dietary supplements and new dietary ingredients.
  • I request that Congress hold hearings and take action to review the FDA's draft guidance and stop their overreach of power.
  • The FDA's draft guidance flies in the face of the original congressional intent of the Dietary Supplement Health Education Act: The guidance turns what was meant to be a simple notification system for new dietary ingredients into a preapproval scheme that Congress did not intend to create.
  • Congress recognized that dietary supplements are natural ingredients and therefore inherently safer than drugs and chemical food ingredients. It did not intend that the FDA would have the power to approve or reject dietary supplements.
  • The FDA's draft guidance creates unnecessary regulations that limit my access to dietary supplements I rely on. The expensive and burdensome process will force between 20,000 and 42,000 dietary supplements to be removed from the market and will increase the cost of those supplements that remain.
  • The draft guidance hurts our economy. Expert analyses show that this guidance will cause a total economic loss of $21.2 billion to $39.8 billion annually.
  • Thank you for your time.
Tips:
  • Be courteous and respectful.
  • Keep your comments brief and focused on the facts.
  • Always thank the staff member for their time taking your call.
SAMPLE LETTER TO CONGRESS:
The Honorable _________________________ Washington, D.C.
In direct violation of the law, the FDA is threatening to ban my access to new dietary supplements.
The FDA defines dietary supplements as being "new" if they were introduced after October 15, 1994. That means that nutrients that I have been safely using over the course of three decades will be subject to the FDA's oppressive policies that mandate costly animal testing, which translates into forced withdrawal from the market, and higher prices for me if the supplement is ever allowed to be sold again.
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 states that:
"The Federal Government should not take any actions to impose unreasonable regulatory barriers limiting or slowing the flow of safe products and accurate information to consumers."
It says that Congress finds that:
"dietary supplements are safe within a broad range of intake, and safety problems with the supplements are relatively rare."
And it says that:
"legislative action that protects the right of access of consumers to safe dietary supplements is necessary in order to promote wellness."
This draft guidance does the exact opposite of what Congress intended. It imposes unreasonable barriers that limit and slow the flow of safe products and accurate information to consumers. I call upon Congress to:
  • Uphold the landmark legislation it passed seventeen years ago, and to direct the FDA to revise its New Dietary Ingredient draft guidelines to reflect DSHEA's (and Congress's) stated values and goals.
  • Vote against the newly introduced Dietary Supplement Labeling Act as this would give the FDA even greater arbitrary powers to remove safe dietary supplements from the market, and will profoundly impact this nations' health in a negative way.
All of these proposals result in wasteful federal spending, while at the same time impose a massive new "regulatory tax" on consumers and the vitamin industry.
Kindly let me know what actions you are taking in response to the urgent issues raised in this letter.
Sincerely,
Name________________________________________
Address______________________________________
City______________________ST____ Zip__________
References: