(NaturalNews) Angelina Jolie's announcement of undergoing a double
mastectomy (surgically removing both breasts) even though she had no
breast cancer is not the innocent, spontaneous, "heroic choice" that has
been portrayed in the mainstream media. Natural News has learned it all coincides with a well-timed for-profit corporate P.R. campaign
that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide with the
upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1
patent.
This is the investigation the mainstream media refuses to
touch. Here, I explain the corporate financial ties, investors,
mergers, human gene patents, lawsuits, medical fear mongering and the trillions
of dollars that are at stake here. If you pull back the curtain on this
one, you find far more than an innocent looking woman exercising a
"choice." This is about protecting trillions in profits through the
deployment of carefully-crafted public relations campaigns designed to
manipulate the public opinion of women.
The signs were all there
from the beginning of the scheme: Angelina Jolie's highly polished and
obviously corporate-written op-ed piece at the New York Times, the
carefully-crafted talking points invoking "choice" as a
politically-charged keyword, and the obvious coaching of even her
husband Brad Pitt who carefully describes the entire experience using
words like "stronger" and "pride" and "family."
But the smoking gun is the fact that Angelina Jolie's seemingly spontaneous announcement magically appeared on the cover of People Magazine this week -- a magazine that is usually finalized for publication three weeks
before it appears on newsstands. That cover, not surprisingly, uses the
same language found in the NYT op-ed piece: "HER BRAVE CHOICE" and
"This was the right thing to do." The flowery, pro-choice language is
not a coincidence.
What this proves is that Angelina's Jolie's announcement was a well-planned corporate P.R. campaign with carefully-crafted messages designed to influence public opinion. But what could Jolie be seeking to influence?
...how about trillions of dollars in corporate profits?
No comments:
Post a Comment